Saturday, October 30, 2010

Shout Out Saturday

If you’re looking for some epic sword and shield action to get you through the beginnings of winter, look no further. Elgin Community College is putting on a production Ajax by Sophocles.

Fridays and Saturdays, November 5 through 20 at 8 p.m

Sundays, November 14 and 21 at 3 p.m

I hear tell that our very own Zev Steinberg has a cameo, this, in addition to the choreography work in put in to this show. Ya’ll should go out and support him.

I also hear there are animals. Animals! I say.


-Tiny-

Friday, October 29, 2010

Fun Fact Friday!


Fuego!

Above is the fire Tetrahedron. It used to be the fire triangle but recently they added the chain/chemical reaction portion.

For fire to live and thrive it needs all of these parts to be complete. In contrast, to kill fire all you have to do is remove a component. There are exceptions, as always, but they are rare.

Knowing how these components works, however, allows us to "control" and manipulate fire to do things we want it to do. Control is in quotes because the reality is that we are not yet able to truly control fire. We can produce it, feed it, and kill it on cue but it always has a mind of its own and at any point, even well safetied situations, the fire can break free and become disastrous.

The interesting and fun part is the flame. The flame is a result of the gasses and solids reacting, being heated, getting excited, and releasing energy in the form of light as they cool. The color of the flame lets you know what types of gasses have been produced or used and how hot the fire is.

White is the hottest color for fire in organic material. You can most often find that color blazing at the base of forest fires. The color cools as it progresses to yellow, then to orange, then red. Blue flames are produced with complete combustion of a gas which only emits one wavelength of light instead of the mix from multiple reactants or incomplete combustion.

This is the main reason it is very difficult, or impossible, to breathe during a fire gag. The hot gasses that are swirling around your body will completely burn your insides if inhaled. This burning is intense, painful, and will often lead to infection, long term injury or death.

It is yet another reason the fire gag in stunts is taken so extremely seriously. Taking for granted and paying attention to the safety of only the outside area can be a fatal misjudgement.

Greg

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Think Tank Thursday

It's All In Your Head
"We wince when we are seeing someone in pain and become anxious when looking at a picture depicting a scene of horror, but we are responding to our own mental representations, not to the pain or the scene."
For our purposes the "we" is the audience.
When the audience is watching a piece of violence (or any part of a play for that matter) their minds are scouring memory banks for ways to relate and better understand what they are seeing.
The audience will never fully understand what the character is experiencing because, simply put, they are not the character. They can only understand how they have felt in a situation similar or an emotion similar.
If it sounds like brain melting double speak think about this: when a friend is in pain can you feel the pain they are feeling?
You may feel a similar pain in empathy but you can't feel their pain, only they can feel it. The action that caused the pain in the first place may not even affect you. Your empathy comes from an event you had similar that evokes the appropriate emotion to support your friend.
With that in mind, think about the time (because we have all had it) where you are trying to console or calm someone who is upset for a reason you don't understand. How much harder is this than the first situation?
This is what the audience experiences in a play. Audiences react more to things they understand. While this Is a common sense statement, the reason why lay with how they process that understanding.
This is the knowledge that makes reaching an audience more effective. It is yet another reason in the long list of reasons why specifics in theater are so vital.
For violence the intention has to be specific. Not everyone can relate to driving a knife into someone's heart. They can relate to having the desire to do so.
And that is the point of what we do. We want them to react to the story more than to the movement (although oohs and ahhs can be gratifying).
To get them  to react make the story clear. The audience has to understand to relate, relate to react, react to enjoy/learn, enjoy  and learn to come back and tell friends and make you that money!
Greg

Monday, October 25, 2010

Martial Arts/Movie Monday: Good Fights are Where You Can Find Them

I'm assuming most folks subscribing to this list, like me, are fans of a good fighting film. Be that a 70s Hong Kong chop-socky flick, one of the state-of-the-art Bourne movies, or Jackie Chan/Jet Li in their 80s/90s prime.

However, some of the best (or at least memorable) onscreen fighting sometimes occurs where and when you least expect it. And when well-integrated with the acting and direction, can truly heighten the stakes or add a new dimension to the onscreen characters. The suburb mystery noir L.A. Confidential (1997) is hardly what anyone would consider an action film, but the gunfight that occurs near the end is a cathartic explosion of all the emotional tension building out of the labyrinthine plot, as well as being staged for maximum hair-raising effect (I refuse to post a clip; you must watch the entire film).

So, here are some of my favorite fight scenes from non-fight specific films.

Bathhouse fight from Eastern Promises (2007)
Actor Viggo Mortensen and director David Cronenberg re-teamed after the success of A History of Violence (2005) (Which sadly, I still haven't seen) with this slow-burn drama set amid Russian mobsters in contemporary London. Mortensen's Nikolai is set up to take a hit at a Turkish bath, and finds himself under brutal attack by two hit-men armed with linoleum knives while wearing nothing but his birthday suit and a towel. The nudity was apparently Mortensen's idea, and it really raises the stakes. You can't help but share his character's sense of vulnerability as he attempts defend himself amid slippery floors and surfaces. (Unfortunately, no [legal] clip could be found; rent it).

Bar fight from Bad Day at Black Rock (1955)
Great, great, great Hollywood classic by director John Sturges. An excellent meditation on race and intolerance that also serves as a tightly focused murder mystery. In this scene, Spencer Tracy, as a mysterious one-armed stranger visiting a small southwestern town where the locals don't take too kindly too him, uses a combination of karate and judo to take out a yokel thug played by Ernst Borgnine. The choreography is a bit hokey by today's standards, but it increases the sense of mystery about the character.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhUBH6gpXV8

Alley fight from They Live (1988)
This one is actually memorable for its sheer awfulness. John Carpenter's late-80s sci-fi satire Reagan-era greed and yuppism (turns out all the rich folks in power are extraterrestrials) featured one of the most pointless and dragged-out fight scenes ever filmed between then-hot WWF wrestler Rod (a.k.a. "Roddy Roddy") Piper and actor Keith David. Back then as today, audiences scratch their heads as to what Carpenter was thinking.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsZpdUUdd3I

Street/restaurant fight from Bridget Jones Diary (2001)
I'll probably lose credibility with my guy friends for admitting that I saw the film, but the fight scene between Colin Firth and Hugh Grant in Bridget Jones Diary ranks as one of my all-time favorite onscreen battles between two characters who clearly don't know how to fight. It doesn't say much about English manliness, but it's pretty damn funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2cxYNyYwBY

Hallway fight from Grosse Pointe Blank (1997)
Okay, this probably shouldn't be included in this particular list. Grosse Pointe Blank is clearly an action film (though also very much a comedy) with John Cusack playing the quintessential hitman-with-a-conscience (I sometimes wonder if this movie trope actually exists in real life). However, the majority of the action scenes involve John Woo-style gunplay, while the (arguably classic) hallway fight between Cusack and champion kickboxer Benny "The Jet" Urquidez (also Cusack's coach) is a standout dual of hand, foot and fist. Luckily, this film was made prior to the over-saturation of Bourne-style shaky cam, so we get a wonderful, full-frame view of the action that shows that Cusack clearly knew his stuff (or at least practiced a hell of a lot with his choreographer).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0ScNLt2zNc

Dwight

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Shout Out Saturday

If you find yourself suffering from a serious case of the boreds this coming Monday (October 25th), then you should get over to the Viaduct Theater and watch Chicago’s own Mud Queens do some “blood” wrestling.

The show starts at 8pm and the charge is $15, well worth it for some sure-to-be hilarious blood wrestling.

Also at the Viaduct Theater is Reefer Madness. I’ve mentioned this show before, but now having seen it myself, I strongly encourage all to go. This show is not only done well, it’s also extremely funny.

If you need any more encouragement to go (which you shouldn't), there is a cash bar open before the show and a “goat” during.


--Tiny

Friday, October 22, 2010

Fun Fact Friday

 

Trisodium Citrate!

Thats right, its nerd time!

Na3C6H5O7, also known as just plain sodium citrate. This is the key ingredient in my stage blood that makes it wash out of clothing while maintaining its edibility/safety.

Many of us have consumed trisodium citrate at some point or another. It is mainly used as a food additive for preservation and/or flavor. If you have ever had the energy drinks Rockstar or Redbull then you have had this in your system.

Funny enough, it is used as an anticoagulant in blood transfusions and for the preservation of blood in blood banks. Kind of fitting that it would be a key component in fake blood!

The last bit that makes this chemical so useful is that it is used as a bio-degradable builder in detergents!

How did I figure out how to use this in blood and where did I get it?

Accidentally and I made it accidentally. (not very glamorous, but why lie?)

I have learned a lot about chemistry in the past few weeks. The drive behind my newly invested chemistry fervor has been to figure out why the hell my blood mixture was turning into the slime from Ghostbusters (Remember the giant tongue in the bathtub?)

What I discovered was that I had citric acid in my mixture. When I added Sodium Bicarbonate (Baking Soda) it caused a reaction. Baking soda is a base, when a base and acid meet its like the Capulets and the Montagues at a dinner party. The product of this violent Shakespearean dinner is Carbon Dioxide (which makes it rise and chase you), water, and Trisodium Citrate! Booyah!

After that I racked my memory banks from all the chemistry courses I had taken through High School and College, drew a blank, gave up, and googled what I had just done.

To continue with the honesty track, this isn't the only ingredient in my final mixture, and the discovery for me is still way too new to know all of the effects. I do know that it washes out of clothes and it has been friendly to my skin and stomach. There need to be more tests done to know for sure that it is friendly to everyone. The isolated chemical trisodium citrate can be an irritant on its own, so buying it separate may not be as effective.

Who knew that Chemistry would make such a difference to a theatre major...

Greg

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Think Tank Thursday

When is it too real?

Choreographing and performing a fight is a difficult endeavor on so many levels. Is it safe? Is it serving the story? Is it interesting? Am I going to break something? Is it real enough? Is it too real? And any other concern that pops into an overactive mind.

The sweet spot it to settle into the area of being realistic but not too realistic. The term that fits for me is "life like."

If the violence isn't realistic enough the audience doesn't buy it. That is a pretty simple concept with few exceptions (if the play is a fantasy or unrealistic, fantasy or unrealistic violence can fit.)

The harder concept is being too real.

If violence is too realistic it will turn the audience off. It will make them cross the line and be concerned for the actor's safety, or it will trigger too intense of an emotional reaction that will push them to discomfort.

An immediate argument can be made about all the realistic violence we see on T.V. My counter to that is that most T.V. presents life like violence and just approaches realism. To be clear, when talking about television in general it is referring to the basic programming that everyone can watch. Specialty channels like HBO and Showtime can get away with and do show realistic violence because they don't have to worry about the FCC. 

What the general programming is missing in their violence most notably is blood. In fact, many movies are missing blood, or a realistic depiction of it (Kill Bill has plenty but it is in such a way that it is obviously fake). A movie can get slapped with an NC-17 if the violence is too real and that often involves a realistic display of blood.

Why does this addition of fluid push us over the line?

When its made to look real, those effects make the violence and pain almost indistinguishable from real life. Very, very few people actually want to see someone get hurt or in pain. An audience in theatre and of movies need small reminders here and there that things are all for show. The opposite is true in horror movies that really convince you that they are based on fact. The more real you think the terror is the more likely you are to be afraid.

Vocals can be too real, some movement choices and reactions can be too real. While we are striving for accuracy and believability we have to continue to be mindful of the middle ground.

Greg

Sunday, October 17, 2010

The Sunday Special - What We Do Isn't Very Nice



Safety is the number one rule in stage combat, but it is also it’s biggest problem.

When you really think about it, making sure everything is safe is almost a fundamental flaw in stage combat.

There is no other art form, at least that I can think of, where the product is 100% antithetical to the process. A real fight is, by its very nature, not safe. The objective of a physical confrontation, the kind we choreograph on stage, is to inflict enough harm for you to ‘win’. Stage combat therefore completely paradoxical. If you can think of any other art form that is like it, please let me know.

This idea really started to take a hold of me while reading the book Shakespearean Afterlives by John O’Connor, a book that I have mentioned the past couple of weeks. Mr. O’Connor’s observes, [emphasis mine] “stage and screen sword-fighting almost inevitably has a whiff of the heroic and swashbuckling about it, not least because such a combat has to be skillfully choreographed if it is to meet the dual criteria imposed by aesthetics and safety.” (p.31) Imposing those two criteria skillfully it is extremely difficult because the skills required are completely opposite one another.

Looking specifically at stage work: A ‘Love Scene’ may turn you on a bit, or a lot - probably excites the audience just as much; a ‘Death Scene’ makes you cry - great, you’re really nailing it; a ‘Fight Scene’ well you can’t actually hurt the other person. Step in Mr./Mrs. Fight Director.

That’s what we (Fight Directors) do - we make unsafe things safe. That is completely backwards. Hence why we have a job and why it is an incredibly difficult one. Much harder than most think and why we aren’t given the due credit all the time.

I included the picture above because it is now on my wall as it spoke to me as an Actor Combatant and Fight Director. It sums up what we should strive for. Personally, I want to be the very best at portraying compelling staged violence. And compelling staged violence is not very nice at all. How much do we love when we hear an audience gasp at trick/knap/move that we have choreographed or performed? How much do we loathe when an audience is completely silent? The problem comes from our actions in making such a combat safe.

When we first start trying we are given black and white rules about safety. This is what is safe and this is what is not. As I have continued my training there are still black and white things about safety but I’ve come to realize that what is safe and what is not depends entirely on the situation and the performers. That is what’s safe for me may not be safe for you, and vice versa.

For example, when I was in college my fight partner was a Big 10 Varsity Wrestler. He was definitely one of the most gifted actor combatants that I’ve ever worked with. He and I were able to present a more compelling combat and scene because we could perform certain sections a little bit faster, hit a little bit harder, go a little bit bigger. We knew each other and what our capabilities were, and even if one time or another we went a little faster than comfy, hit a little harder then felt good, got a little too into the fight it was never unsafe. He and I obviously have athletic abilities that enabled us to perform compelling fights. Others in the class, while technically sound, didn’t push themselves in the same way we did and their fights came across as bland and too safe.

Too Safe = Bad Stage Combat.

And unfortunately we see that type of stage combat way too often. Its boring and it sucks and its painful to watch and makes theater companies think, “We paid how much for this?” We need to raise the bar.

My challenge to all reading this - Go Big, or Go Home!

We’re not living up to our own expectations. Push the boundaries what you think is safe, more than likely you can go farther. Actors, Combatants and Fight Directors all need stretch ourselves more, push the boundaries on what is comfortable much as you would be asked to do in any other scene or theater practice. In order for stage combat and fight directors to get the respect that we all deserve, the product on stage must universally be better.

Every time we stage a fight we need to be excellent. We need to be the very best at what we do. And what we do isn’t very nice.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Fun Fact Friday

Susceptibility.

Memory is no longer considered to be hard data stored in the brain. For a long time brain science compared our biological memory to that of a computer, just not as easily recalled. Now the belief is that memory is a whole lot more quixotic.

Every time you recall a memory it becomes colored with the experiences of the present and restored. If you are presently happy then a happy memory will be enhanced and restored brighter than before. If you are presently sad then that same memory will be dulled a bit and restored with some of its original lustre depleted.

This effect also happens with factual information. We aren't very good at memorizing facts, especially facts without connected emotion. Sure some people seem to be living computers but most of them have to train hard to be able to record so much info (there are a few, however, that have true fact storing and recalling gifts). We even forget the context we learned the original information.

We are really good at generalizing and experts at grouping. Our minds hold onto the general info and then compare that will other similar information or situations. It's often why one thought will trigger another similar one.

With all that in mind (wink), it becomes easy to see how we are very susceptible creatures. Advertisers know this and try to willingly recall our memories and replace or insert themselves. Stuarts soda had a campaign, aided with their old time glass bottles, that had many convinced they had been around since the twenties (they have only been with us since the roaring 80's)!

With violence the audience is coming in with their own preconceived notions and ideas of what things should look like. Sometimes this can jive with where you want to go. Most times it is in opposition.

We can use clever tools to change their minds, however. One show, where I choreographed a series of hits by two hitmen, I put a excerpts from a fictional manual for hitmen in the program. This allowed the audience to gain insight into how the violence in the world of the play was going to go and gave my fighters an edge.

The program is a great place to start. Subtle physical cues in the play, how characters react to eachother or handle weapons, how the relationships change, and many others that I haven't even thought of yet, all aid in us in bringing the audience out if their heads and Into our violent (but safe) playground.

Greg

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Think Tank Thursday

Blood Lust

...from an audience perspective.

I have mentioned many ways stage blood itself can be difficult (stage lights altering color, safe for skin/mouth, washability, sticky, slick, etc.). Physical aspects aside, blood is an attention demanding effect and if not given due respect it will distract or derail the story instead of enhancing it.

First, blood is red. Sometimes bright, sometimes dark. To be over simplific, our eyes go "Shiny object!"
Try for yourself. Look up and note the first color your eyes notice. Every time (unless you cheat!) Your eyes will go to the brightest color first then scan from there.
This may be something from our survival days; poisonous insects and animals are almost always brightly colored, life giving berries and fruits are bright colored, fire and heat glow brightly. It may also be due to the higher frequency of light demanding priority processing in our minds. It may be a combo.

Besides color, blood itself, is a warning of danger. It's never a good sign to be bleeding. We need that blood and our brain freaks out when it starts losing some! When other people are bleeding our brain equally freaks out, it is analyzing how the bleeding may have happened and working out ways to prevent it from occurring to us. A large part of our survival and dominance as a species is associative learning.

An audience watching a play is no different; hell the goal of any play is to teach the audience something. How not to bleed is a gimme. There aren't many people who have been stabbed in the stomach, after watching what happens, real or symbolic, they won't need the experience to know that it sucks.

The overall point is that blood has its own story and objective. It sends the audiences minds to places that often don't involve the play. You have to harness this nature of blood to serve your needs. If blood is out too early or long, the audience will miss important dialogue and action that explains or justifies its presence.

Blood revealed at the right moment, just near the point of a characters death for example (the act and portrayal of dying is just as interesting to the mind as blood), will greatly enhance the moment. An over abundance of blood in a comedy will push the mind past the discomfort envelope into humor.

On paper the blood effect may only appear on one page in one small section. That small area, however, demands the detail of an entire scene. If done effectively that small moment can be a pivotal point. If done ineffectively it can sour the entire show.

Greg

Monday, October 11, 2010

Movie/Martial Arts Monday: Iron & Silk (1990)

"What you learned is garbage" - Master Pan Qing-Fu

One of the more intriguing little films I have ever encountered is "Iron & Silk" directed by Shirley Sun and written by Mark Salzman. The film appeared quietly in 1990 without much buzz or hoopla, gaining favorable notices from some critics and a mild cult following. I discovered in the Blockbuster near my parent's house in River Forest. The cover intrigued me, with it's image of a man doing what looked liked swirly kung-fu movements and the calligraphic 'Iron & Silk' title design. I didn't know what it was about, exactly, but I had to find out.

The film is based on the 1987 book of the same name by Salzman; a memoir of his time living in the People's Republic of China in 1982 working as an English teacher. Salzman (who plays himself in the movie as 'Mark Franklin') is a tall, fair-haired and slightly gangly fellow has recently graduated from Yale University where he has been studying Chinese. His arrival in China is the fulfillment of a childhood fantasy initially spurned on by watching kung-fu films on late-night TV (clips from Jet Li's debut film, the 1982 Mandarin epic "Shaolin Temple" are sprinkled liberally throughout the "Iron & Silk"), taking afterschool kung-fu classes and working in a Chinese restaurant.

A large part of the film is devoted to Salzman/Franklin's joys and trials working as an English teacher (he is assigned to a group known as the "Middle-Aged English Teachers" who are switching from Russian to English due to recent changes in government policy) and his attempts to fit into his surroundings. He has a few run-ins with anti-Americanism, receiving unwelcome comments from locals, plus unpleasant looks when he strikes up a relationship with a pro-Western Chinese student (Vivian Wu, who made her American debut in "The Last Emperor").

However, the part that captivates me the most, and should any martial artist, is the parts of the film depicting Salzman's training in Chinese martial arts. By chance, Salzman's assignment placed him in the same town as Master Pan Qing-Fu, a legendary fighter (by some accounts he single-handedly rounded up scores of criminals on the behalf of the police) and a coach for the national Wushu team ("Wushu" is the Chinese national sport - a codified system of athletic exercises and competition drawing from various traditional martial arts traditions). In a wonderful twist of fate, Master Pan actually plays himself in the movie (This wasn't his only foray into filmmaking. Master Pan was actually one of the villains and fight choreographer for "Shaolin Temple"). And so we get to see how Salzman embarked upon a rigorous path of training in the Chinese martial arts.

The film isn't particularly original or insightful. Although based on his own experiences, Salzman's experiences mirror the arc of many martial arts films (funny enough): the young, impetuous student, seeking out the old master, who initially spurns him as unworthy (in a Yoda-like turn of events). Eventually Salzman's persistence pays off, gaining access to Master Pan's instruction, and ultimately, his respect. The only thing missing is Pan getting killed by the evil master and Salzman having to take arms in revenge.

Yet there is something very poignant here. Very few of the big martial arts films are ever truly about what training is supposed to be, or what you are suppose to be learning. Sure, there's some lip-service paid to honor, loyalty or maybe even some spiritual aspect. But most films are about, well, the fastest way to get to the ass-kicking scenes.

"Iron & Silk" actually attempts to give the viewer an idea what the so-called 'path' of studying martial arts is supposed to be in traditional Asian culture. That it is very much about learning to respect what others do, to value the knowledge that is transmitted and that all-in-all, that there is a great level of responsibility to fulfill. And luckily, without the cheezy soundtrack or final tournament scene like "The Karate Kid."

Viewers are also treated to some excellent displays of Chinese Wushu forms, performed by Master Pan and his students, and later (to some surprise) by Salzman himself, who displays an impressive level of accomplishment.

Check it out.

-Dwight

Sunday, October 10, 2010

The Sunday Special - Buy the Sword?

Now with Video!

Last week I posted the quote from John O’Connor’s Shakespearean Afterlives, where he discussed how he felt a greater sense of waste watching this:


Versus watching this:
Movie Videos & Movie Scenes at MOVIECLIPS.com
My response to this – Duh. Each film comes from a different time, set in drastically different periods, with different intentions. A contemporary audience will absolutely be affected more by the violence of guns over swords because to our society and culture guns are more familiar. Mr. O’Connor isn’t wrong, but he doesn’t understand that guns and swords are just tools of violence. Mr. O’Connor contends, “stage and screen sword fighting almost inevitable has a whiff of the heroic and swashbuckling about it” True, but that’s not because it is the use of the sword but rather the approach to the choreography and the story being told.

This fight:


Is just as Swashbuckling as this:


Or this:


They are just from different periods. But the Gunkata is no less of a ‘balletic display of heroics’ (a phrase I love from Mr. O’Connor’s book) than the sword fight. While entertaining, their purpose is different than holding up a mirror up to nature - the bloody, brutal nature of violence.

Now, weaponry has evolved. The sword is clearly not as an effective weapon as a gun. Which is why the last time the sword was used in actual combat was World War I (also the last war to use horses as cavalry). Hell, it hasn’t been the primary weapon for the past couple of centuries. Entire generations have come to define the Sword not as a weapon of violence but rather as a weapon of Hollywood.

To us Sword fighting is fun. It’s Pirates, Robin Hood, Three Musketeers, dancing a about displaying athletic prowess with a thing that is rarely used for it’s original intended purpose. Sword fight has come to mean sword play. Even the SAFD has come to reflect this when you look at the stylistic approach to Single Sword. We ask for a heroic, swashbuckling nature of it. While a lot of fun scenes like the ones above are not communicating the true nature of a sword fight but rather reflecting a stylized version of violence that has been ingrained in our memory.

Violence is violence. Weapons are just tools of the violence. So whether gun or sword, the end result and the nature is the same - destruction.

Tell me this:


Doesn’t evoke the same emotions as this:


Violence is violence. Perhaps a fight director’s job is a little more difficult with swords for a contemporary audience. Perhaps that was what Mr. O’Connor was getting at that it is more difficult to overcome his and many audiences ingrained notions of the sword. But swords, while less efficient, are no less destructive than a gun.

There is even an argument to be made that because of the proximity needed for the sword to be effective there is a more profound psychological effect than use of a gun. Now, that is just my personal conjecture from reading on the subject (and if you have interest in this look up books like On Killing by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, a compelling read). And also this:


While The Joker is a psychopath it it’s truest definition, what he says is no less true, he just reacts differently than a sane and rational person would. Either way you slice it (bad pun, I know) the sword’s true nature is violence. And violence is, as Mr. O’Connor describes it, “a messy, destructive business” As practitioners of staged violence, would we not want our audiences to feel like “a parent watching the Montague/Capulet fights in the 1590s would be shuddering at the all-too-familiar sight of boys mutilating each other and bleeding ingloriously to death in dirty London alley ways”? Wouldn’t we rather have Mr. O’Connor see that swords too are part of ‘the messy, destructive business’?

I think we do. I think Mr. O’Connor’s final statement on the matter, “Giving boys guns… help us to see their brawling for the messy, destructive business it actually is” misses the point because all brawling, whether using guns, swords, knives or fists is a messy, destructive business. Violence is violence.

Want more examples of brutal sword fights? Check out The Last Samurai, The Duelists, Braveheart to name a few.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Shout Out Saturday

This Just In

True Twilight: a Glee Club Musical has been granted another extension!

You can now catch this delightful little show on Saturdays between October 16th and November 13th at 8:15pm.
Shows are still at Gorilla Tango Theater and I believe tickets are still $12

Go, and tell all your friends!

Opening October 14th

SEVEN BRIDES FOR SEVEN BROTHERS
Book by Lawrence Kasha and David Landay, music by Gene de Paul, Al Kasha and Joel Hirschhorn, and lyrics by Johnny Mercer, Al Kasha and Joel Hirschhorn
Directed by Bill Jenkins
Fights by John Tovar
October 14 - December 19
Drury Lane Theatre Company
100 Drury Lane, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181
www.drurylaneoakbrook.com

::AND::

REEFER MADNESS! THE MUSICAL
Directed by M. William Panek
Fights by Zev Steinberg and Diana Christopher
Performances begin Thursday, October 14, 2010
3111 N. Western Ave. in Chicago's Roscoe Village.
Tickets and information can be found at www.brownpaperbox.org or by calling (773) 296-6024.

                                    Win alert. There's a fight with a garden hoe!!



And Now For Something Completely Different:

On 10/10/10 (Sunday) at 10:10pm, come be a part of, The Beckoning of Lovely at the Bean. What is it? I'm not really sure, but we're supposed to look for a girl with a yellow umbrella and meet her to create something lovely. Watch this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCuSxTjdB

 --Tiny--

Friday, October 8, 2010

Fun Fact Friday

Sleep!

We need it and often in theatre we don't get it.

Scientists are still trying to nail down exactly why we need to sleep, especially for 8 hours. Since every animal has to do it there must be a real importance to it.

So far the basic agreement is that the rest we get when we sleep allows our brains to reuptake chemicals released during the day to make our world real and full of emotions. It may also be the reason the brain sends out a chemical to paralyze us while in deep sleep. Stopping any data from coming in means the brain can get a break from new processing to clean and arrange what it already gathered.

I think of it as cleaning and resetting props and the stage after the show. if you don't have the downtime to do so the stage remains cluttered and all the things you need are scattered everywhere from being used. You can still make it through a show in this disarray but it wont be smooth or as clear.

There is also some evidence that sleep allows us to run through and practice what we have learned that day or are thinking about most. Physical proof is when you wake up after an engaging dream with your heart rate racing, mind confused, and unfortunately exhausted for the rest of the day. With the visualization basketball free throw experiments showing that thinking about something can help someone Improve as much as doing the same activity, the Idea of dreams being practice fields makes sense.

Bottom line is that sleep is one of the most important things you can do to keep yourself safe onstage. It keeps you happy by your brain cleaning out alp the negative chemicals, it keeps your focus sharp, and you may even learn something!

Greg

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Think Tank Thursday

Vocals: Reality vs. Theatricality

Vocalizations are crucial to selling a fight. They are the dialogue that let's the audience know how you feel about the abuse you are giving or receiving. They convey surprise, pain, fear, joy, sorrow, aggression, confidence, etc. Without the vocals it may still look like an interesting and dynamic fight but there won't be a purpose to it, it won't be driving the story.

The reality aspect is challenging. For vocals to really resonate with an audience and effectively get a message across, they have be big, open, clear, and relaxed. Noises in a real fight are anything but.

This is one of the many areas where we jump off our base reality into story telling. While we are choreographing a fight, we are really telling a very short, intense, physical story. No matter how real you play them or how much history you base it off of, a story is not reality. Events are truncated and amplified to elicit reactions and thought. Real reality involves a lot of down time, a lot of calm, and maybe a dash of crazy.

The flip side is that you can't be too over the top. If the vocals don't fit the context the audience doesn't buy it. You have to find the sweet spot with your vocal pain.

Yet another one of the many delicate and beautiful intricacies that make stage combat so wonderfully hard to do.

Greg

Weapons Wednesday

ummm...yeah...this is late....whatever....

I don't know about you guys but I LOVE the show Mythbusters. Just watched an episode where they were testing a claim that the Hungarian Horse Mounted Archers could get twice the penetrating power out of their arrows when they were at full galop. Turns out that the myth was busted. There was an increase of about %25 at 40mph, but that was far from the claim of twice as much.

Got me thinking though about the bow and arrow in general. Is this something that can be used effectively on stage? Naturally if you have a good enough archer, you can have them shoot at set pieces and the like. Also, you can always go for the trusty trick where the shooter fakes a shot and hides the arrow, then then victim reveals a second (identical) arrow as they hold it in the place of contact. Those are the two options that come to mind, but what else?

I therefore pose a question to the Scrappers and the fight community:

How have you used or seen bows and arrows used on stage? Was it effective? How else can we surprise audiences with our use of this weapon?

Please post your response in the comments section below!

-Zev

Monday, October 4, 2010

Martial Arts/Movie Monday: Thoughts on Bruce Lee

It's pretty hard to be a fan of fighting (real or otherwise) without encountering Bruce Lee (1940-1973) in some context. He's inspired too many martial arts students to count in both the U.S. and abroad, and will probably continue to do so.

It's also hard to imagine the Asian martial arts industry without its first true international superstar. Sure, there were other "chop socky" flicks making their way to our shores during the 60s and 70s, but "The Little Dragon" still stands head and shoulders above the rest (Names like Alexander Fu Sheng or Gordon Liu are still known only among die-hard fans). Jackie Chan himself had to work hard to escape Lee's shadow, and only did by going completely in other direction by incorporating acrobatics and slapstick comedy. Without Lee, there would arguably have been no Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen or Stephen Chow (actor/director/star of "Kung-Fu Hustle"). Outside of Hong Kong, Lee inspired the careers of70s Japanese Karate star Sonny Chiba (most recently seen as the sword-making sushi chef in "Kill Bill: Part I"), Chuck Norris and countless others.

Part of Lee's appeal then as well as now is definitely the fact that he was the real deal, probably more so than any of the other stars around. He was an extremely skilled student of traditional Chinese martial arts, embodied by his mastery of Wing Chun kung-fu under the teaching of Master Yip Man. However, he also had a history as a street brawler who was able to handle his way on the mean streets of post-WWII Hong Kong. He was also an iconoclast and innovator, incorporating modern Western ideas about diet, calisthenics and weight lifting into his training, and branching his martial arts training to embrace concepts drawn from Western fencing, boxing, wrestling and (horror of horrors) Japanese martial arts. This culminated in his development of Jeet Kune Do ("Way of the Intercepting Fist") which is usually identified as a 'new' martial art, but is more accurately Lee's philosophy towards fighting (summed up by the idea that one use use what is useful, and discard what is not).

Moreover, Lee was truly philosophical about the path he had chosen. His status as a martial arts moviestar notwithstanding, he really did work as hard as he could to promote the spiritual and ethical dimensions of studying fighting. When he could, he tried to bring these ideas into his movies (The famous/cheesy teaching scene in "Enter the Dragon" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDW6vkuqGLg ] is a good example, as earnest and genuine as it is bit hokey dramatically).

There's not much I can say that accurately describes what impresses me about Mr. Lee. The best thing would be to listen to his own words.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW37eD5i24Q

Sunday, October 3, 2010

The Sunday Special - Now live from the Motherland

So you might be asking yourselves, "You know, where did the Sunday Special Blog posts go? I loved that shit. It was witty and insightful and me me consider stage combat in a new light." Well to those fantastic readers I will tell you. Moving to a new country and starting a graduate program isn't the easiest thing in the world. But that being said, I have not forgotten you.

A few weeks ago I stumbled on this fantastic quote on stage combat from John O'Connor's Shakespearen Afterlives:
I experience a much more profound sense of waste watching the ruin of [Baz] Lurhman’s young American’s [in William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet], and maybe come closer to understanding the horror that Shakespeare’s audiences felt watching boys clumsily care each other up with swords than I ever do with a traditional setting go the play. It’s something to do with the fact that stage and screen sword-fighting almost inevitably has a whiff of the heroic and swashbuckling about it, not least because such a combat has to be skillfully choreographed if it is to meet the dual criteria imposed by aesthetics and safety. But the ensuing display of virtuosity – I’m thinking about the magnificent opening fight scene in [Franco] Zeffirelli’s 1968 film [of Romeo & Juliet] – serves to mask the horror of what’s actually going on, to the extent that the Prince comes across as a bit of spoilsport for stopping it. I feel sure that a parent watching the Montague/Capulet fights in the 1590s would be shuddering at the all-too-familiar sight of boys mutilating each other and bleeding ingloriously to death in dirty London alley ways; not admiring a balletic display of heroics, as it can so easily be for a century that has grown up to think not of sword-fighting but sword-fencing, in which the sword is endowed with romantic and ‘heritage’ connotations along with a the doublet and flagon of sack. Giving boys guns – or, as in 1986 [Michael] Bogdanov version [for the Royal Shakespeare Company], flick-knives and bicycle-chains – help us to see their brawling for the messy, destructive business it actually is.
(Shakespearean Afterlives, John O’Connor, p. 31)

Now I had tried to write several different posts for this quote but I found that it had touched on so many different issues with stage combat that I had trouble getting my thoughts down in a coherent logical flow. There is just too much good bits in that passage that can be explored. In the coming weeks I hope to break down a few of the different aspects that Mr. O'Connor touches upon. Til then, let me know your thoughts and we can explore together.

Til next Sunday, Cheers from the Motherland,
Adam

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Shout Out Saturday!

Looking for something fun to do this Wednesday night?! I think you are – and boy do I have a deal for you!

True Twilight: a Glee Club Musical, is a joyous mash-up/parody of all things campy; True Blood, The Twilight Saga, GLEE, and High School Musical. Thanks to the talent and creativity of all involved with True Twilight, you are guaranteed to laugh.

While the stage combat is minimal and not professionally done, it is fitting with the style of True Twilight.

True Twilight: a Glee Club Musical
Written by Amy Whittenberger
Directed by Andrew Kraft

Final performance:
October 6th
9:30pm
1919 N. Milwaukee Ave. Chicago, IL 60647
Gorilla Tango Theatre


COMING SOON:

McMeekin Finds Out

A new play by Scott Barsotti
Directed by Damon Kiely
Fights by John Tovar

October 7 - November 14
Route 66 Theatre Company
Richard Christiansen Theater at Victory Gardens Biograph Theater
2433 North Lincoln Avenue, Chicago, IL 60614
www.route66theatre.org


-Tiny-



Friday, October 1, 2010

Fun Fact Friday

Special Forces snipers fire in between their own heart beats!

These individuals are so highly trained that they can slow down and control their heart rate, sort of like really lethal versions meditating monks! The snipers do this because a bullet can be thrown of course by the shake of your body from your heart beat. Some even claim to be able to affect blood flow and warmth to certain areas of the body to maintain stillness for long periods or to ready their trigger finger!

Now, we can't show the slowing of our hearts to the audience. Unless your are totally method there is no real reason (besides the cool factor) to train yourself to control your heartrate in this extreme way. What we can show is a character in complete control of his or her body. Someone like that is absolutely aware of and completely owns the space they are in. The way they hold their body and their movements all tell of their complete command. This Is what we as actors/actor combatants can strive to replicate when presented with these characters. It can also be a way to quietly stand out of you are one of the SWAT team or other background soldier.

Own your space and people will notice.

Greg

Think Tank Thursday

Motion tracking.

The human eye does many amazing things on a daily basis thay we take for granted. One of those is tracking moving objects. To accomplish this task we have to be able to lock onto an object and compute what it will look like in the next area of space and time it will be in. We are not just observing, we are anticipating what should logically be next.

Amazing as this is, it comes with limitations. We are only able to track one moving object or person at a time. The amount of focus and computing power doesn't allow us to do more.

We want take advantage of this trait when working to hide knaps and striking techniques. Along with being limited to focusing on one movement at a time, our eyes are always attracted to movement. Our brain gives priority to movement information; perhaps a left over from our survival days.

The more interesting the movement the higher priority and focus. Combat oriented movement is very interesting to the brain. We use the knowledge we vicariously gain from other peoples skirmishes to prepare ourselves for future scuffles of our own; another possible left over survival trait.

Back to stage.

Knowing that combat based movement is going to get processing and focus priority we have the ability to hide knaps in the open or throw punches while exposing the air. You have to direct the audiences focus away from where you don't want it and exactly where you do, and you can't overuse the trick, exactly like a magician performing magic.

Be wary though, our brains are very quick. We make up for our limitation by processing, grouping and judging the information extremely quickly. If you take too much time to execute the move they will catch the gag. Granted, the speed of information processing has its own set backs, but that is for another Thursday.

Greg